Best Zips for Buy-to-Rent Returns in Detroit, Atlanta, Cleveland, Philadelphia;
Buy-or-Rent Analysis Shows Buying More Affordable Than Renting in 66 Percent of Markets
IRVINE, Calif. – July 9, 2015 — RealtyTrac® (www.realtytrac.com), the nation’s leading source for comprehensive housing data, today released a Buy-to-Rent analysis and a Buy-or-Rent analysis on 3-bedroom residential properties in 285 counties nationwide.
Across all 285 counties analyzed, the average potential annual gross rental yield was 8.94 percent for 3-bedroom residential properties purchased in the first five months of 2015, down from a 9.07 percent potential average potential rental return for 3-bedroom residential properties purchased in the same time period a year ago in those same counties.
“As home price appreciation moderates and aligns more closely with trends in rental rates, the returns in the buy-to-rent market are stabilizing and becoming more predictable — if not as lucrative as they were for investors who purchased a few years ago near the bottom of the market,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. “Buying rentals continues to be a brilliant strategy that allows investors to hedge their bets in a real estate market shifting away from homeownership and toward a sharing economy.”
Average rental rates on 3-bedroom properties increased 3 percent from a year ago across all 285 counties analyzed, while average home prices on 3-bedroom properties increased 4 percent across those same counties.
Counties with increasing buy-to-rent returns
Potential buy-to-rent returns still increased in 116 of the 285 counties analyzed (41 percent) thanks to rental rate growth outpacing home price growth in those counties. Major counties where potential buy-to-rent returns increased from a year ago included Orange County, California in the Los Angeles metro area, King County, Washington in the Seattle metro area, Santa Clara County, California in the San Jose metro area, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, and Suffolk County, New York on Long Island.
Other major markets with year-over-year increases in potential buy-to-rent returns included counties in Cincinnati, Cleveland and Columbus in Ohio, Atlanta, Charlotte and Raleigh in North Carolina, Milwaukee, Jacksonville, Florida, Seattle and Denver.
Best counties for buy-to-rent returns
Counties with the highest potential rental returns for 3-bedroom properties purchased in the first five months of 2015 were Clayton County, Georgia in the Atlanta metro area (24.05 percent annual gross rental yield), Bay County, Michigan in the Bay City metro area (19.23 percent), Mahoning County, Ohio in the Youngstown metro area (19.04 percent), Bibb County, Georgia in the Macon metro area (18.11 percent), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (17.67 percent).
There were 51 counties with a combined population of 18.5 million where potential buy-to-rent returns were 10 percent or higher and where average weekly wages in the fourth quarter of 2014 increased 3 percent or more from a year ago. These counties included Wayne County, Michigan in the Detroit metro area (15.50 percent annual gross rental yield), Cuyahoga County, Ohio in the Cleveland metro area (14.62 percent), Milwaukee County, Wisconsin (12.15 percent), Erie County, New York in the Buffalo metro area, and Duval County, Florida in the Jacksonville metro area (13.39 percent).
Best zip codes for buy-to-rent returns
RealtyTrac also analyzed potential buy-to-rent returns in 4,657 zip codes with sufficient fair market rent and home price data in the first five months of 2015.
Zip codes with the highest potential rental returns on 3-bedroom properties purchased in the first five months of 2015 included zip codes in the Detroit, Atlanta, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Jacksonville, Florida, and Memphis metro areas. There were a total of 105 zip codes with a gross annual rental yield of 18 percent or higher.
Buying more affordable than renting in 66 percent of counties
The separate Buy-or-Rent analysis released today found that making monthly house payments on a 3-bedroom property is more affordable than paying fair market rent on a 3-bedroom property in 188 of the 285 counties analyzed (66 percent).
The Buy-or-Rent analysis compared the percentage of median household income in each county that would be needed to pay the fair market rent on a 3-bedroom property in that county to the percentage of median household income that would be needed to make monthly house payments — including mortgage, insurance and property taxes — on an average-priced 3-bedroom property in that county (see full methodology below).
Across all 285 counties analyzed, the average percentage of median household income needed to rent was 29.96 percent while the average percentage of median household income needed to buy was 29.00 percent.
Counties more affordable to buy than rent
Major counties where it is still cheaper to buy than to rent include Miami-Dade County, Florida (42 percent of income to buy), San Bernardino County, California in Inland Southern California (36 percent), Clark County, Nevada in the Las Vegas metro area (27 percent), Broward County, Florida in South Florida (35 percent), and Wayne County, Michigan in the Detroit metro area (23 percent).
“The window is wide open for renters to take advantage of homeownership in South Florida today,” said Mike Pappas, CEO and president of Keyes Company, covering the South Florida market. “Rents have sky rocketed over the past few years and may be peaking, while interest rates are still at historic lows. With the tax savings from interest and real estate tax payments a tenant can own for less than they are currently paying in rent.”
There were 13 counties where it was more affordable to buy in 2015 that had been more affordable to rent in 2014. Those counties included Snohomish County, Washington in the Seattle metro area, Berks County, Pennsylvania in the Reading metro area, Hamilton County, Indiana in the Indianapolis metro area, Thurston County, Washington in the Olympia metro area and Warren County, Ohio, in the Cincinnati metro area. Other markets switching from more affordable renter markets in 2014 to more affordable buyer markets in 2015 included counties in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Cleveland, Ohio, Albany New York and The Villages in central Florida.
“With average statewide wage increases of over 4 percent, low interest rates below 4.5 percent, appreciation rates greater than 3 percent in many Ohio metros, the added tax savings benefits of purchasing a home in today’s market creates a positive investment for the future for many home buyers verses renting,” said Michael Mahon, president at HER Realtors, covering the Cincinnati, Dayton and Columbus markets in Ohio. “As construction costs escalate, coupled with the increasing regulatory costs of housing, the costs of leasing shall continue to rise, as opposed to the cost of purchasing which remains stable because of fixed rate mortgages.”
“In Seattle, a considerable number of single family home renters are made up of people who lost their own homes to foreclosure,” said Matthew Gardner, Chief Economist Windermere Real Estate, covering the Seattle market. “As these ‘boomerang’ buyers are able to requalify for mortgages, I expect many of them will settle in areas outside of Seattle, like Pierce and Snohomish Counties, where the average monthly mortgage payment is lower than rent.”
Counties more affordable to rent than buy
Renting is more affordable than buying in 97 of the 285 counties analyzed (34 percent). Major counties where it is cheaper to rent than to buy include Los Angeles, California (69 percent of median household income needed to buy), San Diego, California (56 percent), Orange, California (57 percent), Riverside County, California in Inland Southern California (43 percent), King County, Washington in the Seattle metro area (45 percent), and Denver County, Colorado (51 percent).
“We are finding many first time homebuyers in a short-term-versus-long-term quandary along the Front Range in Colorado,” said Greg Smith, owner/broker at RE/MAX Alliance, covering the Denver market. “In today’s market many buyers are not willing to take the leap to increase their monthly payment to lock in the fixed payment of a mortgage. This tends to be a short-term perspective that can have a staggering long-term effect for a person’s net worth. When you consider rents are increasing at historically high rates of over 13 percent in many areas it makes a lot of sense to lock in a monthly payment with a mortgage.”
There were 12 counties where it was more affordable to rent in 2015 that had been more affordable to buy in 2014. Those counties included Sacramento County, California; San Joaquin County, California in the Stockton metro area; Lancaster County, Pennsylvania; Spokane County, Washington; and Polk County, Iowa in the Des Moines metro area. Other markets switching from more affordable buyer markets in 2014 to more affordable renter markets in 2015 included counties in Reno, Nevada, Sarasota, Florida, St. Louis and Jacksonville, Florida.
For this report, RealtyTrac analyzed all U.S. counties with a population of 100,000 or more and with sufficient home price and rental rate data. Rental returns were calculated using annual gross rental yields: the 2015 average fair market rent of 3-bedroom homes in each county from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), annualized, and divided by the average sales price of 3-bedroom residential properties in the first five months of 2015.
RealtyTrac also incorporated average weekly wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and median household income data from the U.S. Census into the report.
Estimated home payment amount was made assuming a 10 percent down payment, a 30-year fixed rate loan with the average interest rate from the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey, mortgage insurance of 1 percent of the home price annually, property insurance of 0.35 percent of the home price annually and property taxes based on average property taxes for all 3-bedroom residential properties using tax assessor data collected by RealtyTrac.
Affordability for rent was calculated by dividing the annual fair market rent for a 3-bedroom property in each county by the estimated median household income for that county. Affordability for buying was calculated by dividing the annualized house payment for an average-priced 3-bedroom property in each county by the estimated median household income for that county.
This RealtyTrac report is the result of a proprietary evaluation of information compiled by RealtyTrac; the report and any of the information in whole or in part can only be quoted, copied, published, re-published, distributed and/or re-distributed or used in any manner if the user specifically references RealtyTrac as the source for said report and/or any of the information set forth within the report.
Data Licensing and Custom Report Order
Investors, businesses and government institutions can contact RealtyTrac to license bulk foreclosure and neighborhood data or purchase customized reports. For more information please contact our Data Licensing Department at 800.462.5193 or email@example.com.
RealtyTrac is a leading provider of comprehensive U.S. housing and property data, including nationwide parcel-level records for more than 130 million U.S. properties. Detailed data attributes include property characteristics, tax assessor data, sales and mortgage deed records, distressed data, including default, foreclosure and auctions status, and Automated Valuation Models (AVMs). Sourced from RealtyTrac subsidiary Homefacts.com, the company’s proprietary national neighborhood-level database includes more than 50 key local and neighborhood level dynamics for residential properties, providing unrivaled pre-diligence capabilities and a parcel risk database for portfolio analysis. RealtyTrac’s data is widely viewed as the industry standard and, as such, is relied upon by real estate professionals and service providers, marketers and financial institutions, as well as the Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury Department, HUD, state housing and banking departments, investment funds and tens of millions of consumers.
RealtyTrac Media Contacts:
949.502.8300, ext. 268
Jennifer von Pohlmann
949.502.8300, ext. 139
Data and Report Licensing: