Foreclosures Home News and Trends Center Press Room
News & Events
RealtyTrac News  >>  Press Coverage  Press Releases  Video News Releases  Event Schedule
About the Company  >>  Backgrounder  Fact Sheet  Bios  Press Contacts
Newsletters  >>  Customer Newsletter
General Real Estate  >>  Real Estate Glossary  Financial Calculators

 
Press Releases
 
SUN BELT DOMINATES FIRST HALF 2009 FORECLOSURE RANKINGS BUT UNEMPLOYMENT-RELATED FORECLOSURES MAY BE SPREADING
By RealtyTrac Staff   

 

Las Vegas, Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Merced Post Top Metro Foreclosure Rates;
Cities in Oregon, Utah, Idaho, Arkansas Show Significant Growth

IRVINE, Calif. – July 30, 2009 – RealtyTrac® (realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its Midyear 2009 Metropolitan Foreclosure Market Report, which shows that cities in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona continued to document the nation’s highest foreclosure rates in the first half of 2009, with those states accounting for 35 of the 50 highest foreclosure rates among metro areas with a population of 200,000 or more.

While some of the most foreclosure-saturated metro areas in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and California posted declining foreclosure activity in the first six months of 2009, other areas of the country not previously considered foreclosure hot spots have seen increased levels of activity. More than 20 percent of the metro areas which showed above average levels of foreclosure activity were in states such as Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Arkansas, Illinois and South Carolina, suggesting that much of the new foreclosure activity may be more directly related to growing unemployment than continuing fallout from subprime and adjustable rate loans.

“Foreclosure activity continued its upward trajectory nationwide and in the majority of metro areas in the first half of the year, but there are some significant differences beginning to show up in the data,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “While some of the markets that had the highest saturation of foreclosures over the past few years have seen declining rates, new markets like Provo, Utah, and Boise, Idaho, have seen large increases. As unemployment rates increase in different parts of the country, it’s very likely that we’ll see similar patterns develop elsewhere.”

Top metro foreclosure rates
Las Vegas posted the nation’s highest metro foreclosure rate, with 7.45 percent of its housing units (one in 13) receiving at least one foreclosure filing in the first half of 2009 — more than six times the national average. A total of 58,691 Las Vegas properties received a foreclosure filing during the first half of 2009, a 22 percent increase from the previous six months and a 56 percent increase from the first half of 2009.

The Cape Coral-Fort Myers metro area in Florida documented the second highest metro foreclosure rate in the first half of 2009, with 7.20 percent of its housing units (one in every 14) receiving at least one foreclosure filing, and Merced, Calif., documented the third highest metro foreclosure rate, with 6.89 percent of its housing units (one in 15) receiving at least one foreclosure filing. Both Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Merced reported a slight decrease in foreclosure activity from the previous six months but still reported increasing foreclosure activity from the first half of 2008.

Other metro areas in the top 10 were the California cities of Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (5.73 percent), Stockton (5.64 percent), Modesto (5.38 percent), Bakersfield (4.53 percent) and Vallejo-Fairfield (4.48 percent), along with the Phoenix metro area (4.44 percent) and the Orlando, Fla., metro area (4.28 percent). All seven of these metro areas except for Stockton and Modesto reported increasing foreclosure activity from the previous six months and from the first six months of 2008.

Declining foreclosure activity in some foreclosure hot spots
Foreclosure activity in Stockton decreased nearly 4 percent from the previous six months and nearly 13 percent from the first half of 2008, and foreclosure activity in Modesto decreased nearly 3 percent from the previous six months and more than 9 percent from the first half of 2008.

With 1.86 percent of its housing units receiving a foreclosure filing in the first half of 2009, Detroit’s foreclosure rate continued to rank among the top 50 metro foreclosure rates, but foreclosure activity there decreased 8 percent from the previous six months and 16 percent from the first half of 2008. Detroit’s foreclosure rate ranked highest in the nation in RealtyTrac’s 2006 and 2007 reports. 

Foreclosure activity in Cleveland, which posted the nation’s sixth highest foreclosure rate in 2007, decreased 11 percent from the previous six months and 30 percent from the first half of 2008. With 1.36 percent of its housing units (one in 73) receiving at least one foreclosure filing, Cleveland’s foreclosure rate was still above the national average but was not among the top 50 metro foreclosure rates in the first half of 2009.

Other hard-hit Rust Belt cities posting year-over-year declines were Indianapolis and the Ohio cities of Toledo and Columbus.

 

Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the total number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported during the first six months of 2009. Data is also available at the individual county level and MSA level for Midyear 2009, Q2 2009 and June 2009. Data is collected from more than 2,200 counties nationwide, and those counties account for more than 90 percent of the U.S. population. RealtyTrac’s report incorporates documents filed in all three phases of foreclosure: Default — Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS); Auction — Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more than one foreclosure document is filed against a property during the month or quarter, only the most recent filing is counted in the report.

 

 

U.S. Metro Foreclosure Market Data – Jan-Jun 2009

    Properties with Foreclosure Filings
Rate Rank Metro Name Total %Housing Units 1/every X HU %Change from Jul-Dec 08 %Change from Jan-Jun 08

--

U.S. Total

1,528,364

1.19

84

9.46

14.66

1

Las Vegas-Paradise, NV Total

58,691

7.45

13

22.20

56.22

2

Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL Total

25,926

7.20

14

-2.66

26.06

3

Merced, CA Total

5,725

6.89

15

-2.00

14.73

4

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Total

82,339

5.73

17

11.41

11.75

5

Stockton, CA Total

12,787

5.64

18

-3.96

-12.79

6

Modesto, CA Total

9,344

5.38

19

-2.75

-9.21

7

Bakersfield, CA Total

12,176

4.53

22

10.62

17.34

8

Vallejo-Fairfield, CA Total

6,706

4.48

22

3.92

6.63

9

Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Total

74,053

4.44

22

10.96

51.71

10

Orlando-Kissimmee, FL Total

37,801

4.28

23

15.32

76.23

11

Port St. Lucie, FL Total

8,249

4.00

25

1.76

27.50

12

Naples-Marco Island, FL Total

6,990

3.64

27

12.22

56.90

13

Reno-Sparks, NV Total

6,515

3.63

28

31.86

88.73

14

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL Total

85,399

3.54

28

11.35

40.87

15

Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA Total

29,324

3.46

29

8.58

1.51

16

Salinas, CA Total

4,339

3.11

32

-8.52

-0.94

17

Fresno, CA Total

9,375

3.08

32

14.74

17.13

18

Visalia-Porterville, CA Total

3,948

2.91

34

25.97

50.63

19

Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL Total

6,635

2.69

37

15.92

46.82

20

San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Total

30,297

2.67

37

6.91

-0.05

21

Lakeland, FL Total

7,407

2.67

37

3.36

47.52

22

Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL Total

10,364

2.66

38

-4.20

18.11

23

Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Total

33,906

2.58

39

-2.98

31.50

24

Ocala, FL Total

4,086

2.57

39

22.34

79.53

25

Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Total

6,762

2.48

40

15.45

18.67

26

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Total

106,105

2.41

42

27.07

29.95

27

Prescott, AZ Total

2,518

2.41

42

48.20

91.34

28

Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL Total

6,316

2.38

42

-2.52

20.05

29

Greeley, CO Total

2,156

2.33

43

14.01

-11.53

30

Jacksonville, FL Total

13,556

2.32

43

25.16

59.44

31

Provo-Orem, UT Total

3,168

2.24

45

62.88

128.57

32

Boise City-Nampa, ID Total

5,214

2.21

45

46.50

121.21*

33

Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Total

4,164

2.11

47

4.83

21.51

34

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Total

3,838

2.09

48

19.53

65.50

35

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Total

42,799

2.02

49

10.93

11.47

36

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Total

32,439

1.92

52

7.69

8.74

37

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Total

11,924

1.89

53

10.51

17.56

38

Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Total

35,352

1.86

54

-8.23

-16.37

39

Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI Total

63,573

1.69

59

21.60

30.31

40

Tucson, AZ Total

7,107

1.67

60

17.70

61.96

41

Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA Total

1,693

1.65

61

15.09

20.58

42

Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA Total

2,483

1.64

61

5.66

11.00

43

Memphis, TN-MS-AR Total

8,598

1.57

64

0.29

-16.06††

44

Flint, MI Total

3,028

1.53

65

-7.60

-17.04

45

Denver-Aurora, CO Total

15,630

1.50

67

-7.90

-29.43

46

Indianapolis-Carmel, IN Total

11,037

1.48

68

0.44

-11.98

47

San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA Total

1,706

1.47

68

29.54

60.79

48

Columbus, OH Total

11,231

1.45

69

1.44

-5.69

49

Colorado Springs, CO Total

3,690

1.44

69

5.19

8.27

50

Lansing-East Lansing, MI Total

2,822

1.44

70

23.45

17.63

51

Toledo, OH Total

4,298

1.43

70

-1.94

-10.85

52

Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL Total

2,793

1.42

71

9.19

23.09

53

Rockford, IL Total

2,029

1.41

71

24.94

15.09

54

Canton-Massillon, OH Total

2,443

1.38

73

-2.71

-17.05

55

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Total

29,211

1.37

73

-7.52†

-9.56†

56

Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH Total

12,862

1.36

73

-11.45

-30.34

57

Chico, CA Total

1,289

1.36

74

14.99

47.48

58

Salt Lake City, UT Total

5,322

1.36

74

22.71

63.15

59

Ogden-Clearfield, UT Total

2,397

1.35

74

49.91

82.00

60

Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Total

11,647

1.31

76

64.53

112.73

61

Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI Total

4,178

1.31

76

2.05

13.72

62

Charleston-North Charleston, SC Total

3,629

1.29

78

25.83

364.66*

63

Dayton, OH Total

4,717

1.24

81

1.27

-19.55

64

Salem, OR Total

1,724

1.18

85

69.02

101.64

65

Macon, GA Total

1,138

1.11

90

14.60

5.37

66

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Total

14,629

1.11

90

39.43

58.63

67

Holland-Grand Haven, MI Total

1,068

1.06

94

35.02

36.40

68

Gainesville, FL Total

1,220

1.06

94

41.53

91.82

69

Akron, OH Total

3,222

1.05

96

-30.12

-39.34

70

Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI Total

6,789

1.04

97

27.52

1.88

71

Green Bay, WI Total

1,380

1.03

97

117.67

146.87*

72

Ann Arbor, MI Total

1,440

0.98

102

-4.89

-15.34

73

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Total

8,827

0.97

103

-5.73

-11.52

74

Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC Total

2,594

0.97

104

22.82

138.64*

75

Fort Wayne, IN Total

1,681

0.95

106

-12.31

-14.19

76

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Total

13,179

0.94

107

25.73

71.96

77

Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI Total

823

0.93

108

-7.01

-26.52

78

Fort Collins-Loveland, CO Total

1,179

0.93

108

2.61

-13.05

79

Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA Total

2,406

0.92

109

-0.62

-14.80

80

Kalamazoo-Portage, MI Total

1,308

0.90

111

-3.04

3.56

81

Atlantic City, NJ Total

1,131

0.89

112

-20.96

14.47

82

Worcester, MA Total

2,828

0.89

112

-1.87

-38.06

83

Savannah, GA Total

1,282

0.89

112

34.10

18.59

84

Tallahassee, FL Total

1,391

0.88

114

24.09

61.93

85

Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC Total

1,420

0.84

118

255.89*

342.37*

86

Kansas City, MO-KS Total

7,087

0.82

122

-4.35†

-8.27†

87

South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI Total

1,126

0.81

124

-4.33

-10.49

88

Olympia, WA Total

809

0.81

124

5.20

66.80

89

Manchester-Nashua, NH Total

1,297

0.80

125

1.89

16.53

90

Eugene-Springfield, OR Total

1,188

0.80

126

55.09

100.34

91

St. Louis, MO-IL Total

9,713

0.79

127

-18.45†

-21.16†

92

Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC Total

5,284

0.78

129

10.18†

127.56†

93

Chattanooga, TN-GA Total

1,759

0.77

130

11.75

-6.93††

94

Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR Total

2,264

0.77

130

-5.71

7.25

95

Birmingham-Hoover, AL Total

3,814

0.76

131

217.04*

271.37*

96

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Total

18,037

0.76

131

6.63

-16.52

97

New Haven-Milford, CT Total

2,585

0.74

135

-16.02

-30.77

98

Mobile, AL Total

1,313

0.73

136

75.30*

28.22*

99

York-Hanover, PA Total

1,272

0.73

137

16.91

57.04

100

Tulsa, OK Total

2,835

0.71

140

6.34

0.39

101

Brownsville-Harlingen, TX Total

1,021

0.71

141

14.46

21.69

102

Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Total

4,769

0.71

142

-2.33

-19.98

103

Richmond, VA Total

3,549

0.70

144

21.21

33.02

104

Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Total

12,614

0.69

144

4.53

-40.69

105

San Antonio, TX Total

5,185

0.68

146

24.58

20.00

106

Trenton-Ewing, NJ Total

956

0.68

147

-37.60

-17.80

107

Reading, PA Total

1,071

0.67

150

-11.05

81.22

108

Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Total

2,322

0.66

151

-19.57

-29.64

109

Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Total

14,213

0.65

153

3.52

-31.32

110

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN Total

4,183

0.65

153

-4.93

-24.93††

111

Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC Total

1,459

0.64

155

21.08

3.84

112

Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC Total

4,499

0.63

158

-11.70

-23.91

113

Springfield, MO Total

1,129

0.62

163

-11.66†

52.16†

114

Montgomery, AL Total

961

0.61

163

94.53*

167.69*

115

Boulder, CO Total

754

0.61

164

8.96

-2.58

116

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL Total

1,004

0.61

164

36.97

39.64

117

Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX Total

882

0.61

165

28.01

40.00

118

Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA Total

1,414

0.60

167

11.34

48.53

119

New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Total

2,646

0.60

167

10.94

18.23

120

Columbia, SC Total

1,860

0.60

167

22.29

31.63

121

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Total

14,219

0.60

168

-7.89

-5.95

122

Madison, WI Total

1,464

0.59

169

138.44*

69.05*

123

Greensboro-High Point, NC Total

1,834

0.59

170

-22.97

-13.98

124

Springfield, MA Total

1,653

0.58

171

17.40

-50.52

125

Austin-Round Rock, TX Total

3,689

0.58

173

19.19

26.68

126

Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Total

1,888

0.57

176

34.47*

68.57*

127

Bremerton-Silverdale, WA Total

567

0.56

178

-11.82

5.00

128

Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Total

1,354

0.55

182

-19.12

-3.01

129

Winston-Salem, NC Total

1,123

0.54

184

-21.85

-19.90

130

Columbus, GA-AL Total

686

0.54

187

17.47

3.47

131

Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN Total

2,922

0.53

187

3.43

50.93

132

Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV Total

598

0.53

189

18.89

33.18

133

Roanoke, VA Total

738

0.53

189

294.65*

515.00*

134

Pittsburgh, PA Total

5,830

0.53

190

-8.68

14.49

135

Anchorage, AK Total

728

0.52

192

-17.08

3.70

136

Knoxville, TN Total

1,604

0.52

193

-6.09

-21.26††

137

Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Total

2,518

0.51

195

-13.68

-33.53

138

Albuquerque, NM Total

1,781

0.50

198

37.74*

-0.28

139

Fort Smith, AR-OK Total

614

0.50

201

18.99

6.41

140

Norwich-New London, CT Total

574

0.49

203

-24.17

-30.51

141

Huntsville, AL Total

819

0.49

204

85.71*

136.02*

142

Appleton, WI Total

442

0.49

205

114.56*

29.62*

143

Honolulu, HI Total

1,616

0.48

207

30.53

275.81

144

Amarillo, TX Total

467

0.48

210

9.37

5.66

145

Raleigh-Cary, NC Total

2,024

0.48

210

-4.44

-24.70

146

Wichita, KS Total

1,226

0.47

211

18.23

39.48

147

New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA Total

34,889

0.47

211

-7.34

-23.46

148

Baltimore-Towson, MD Total

5,224

0.47

212

-11.08

-22.48

149

Barnstable Town, MA Total

727

0.47

214

18.02

-55.99

150

Clarksville, TN-KY Total

498

0.46

218

-1.97

-10.75††

151

Waco, TX Total

404

0.44

227

3.32

-9.62

152

Lancaster, PA Total

796

0.41

244

1.14

90.89*

153

Peoria, IL Total

667

0.41

244

-11.77

-22.44

154

El Paso, TX Total

1,036

0.41

244

37.77

42.11

155

Laredo, TX Total

281

0.41

246

2.93

103.62

156

Jackson, MS Total

865

0.39

254

157.44*

85.22*

157

Springfield, IL Total

373

0.39

258

-16.37

-29.49

158

Baton Rouge, LA Total

1,237

0.39

259

189.70*

67.39*

159

Topeka, KS Total

392

0.38

263

20.62

29.80

160

Rochester, NY Total

1,601

0.36

276

-12.23

-28.04

161

Corpus Christi, TX Total

636

0.36

277

-0.93

-7.69

162

Durham, NC Total

740

0.35

288

-20.43

-44.86

163

Erie, PA Total

407

0.35

290

29.62

41.32*

164

Oklahoma City, OK Total

1,707

0.33

305

-34.65

-47.22

165

Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY Total

1,663

0.32

313

-30.21

2.28*

166

Yakima, WA Total

261

0.32

317

50.87

-21.86

167

Cedar Rapids, IA Total

347

0.31

320

-2.80

-10.80

168

Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Total

501

0.29

344

68.69

53.21

169

Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Total

699

0.27

369

-10.50

-30.65

170

Champaign-Urbana, IL Total

255

0.26

382

32.81

-10.84

171

Sioux Falls, SD Total

235

0.26

389

19.90

66.67

172

Evansville, IN-KY Total

409

0.26

390

-37.94

-42.64

173

Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME Total

644

0.25

395

-11.29

-9.93

174

Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Total

573

0.25

402

93.58*

-10.47

175

Spartanburg, SC Total

298

0.25

405

-46.98

-44.09

176

Binghamton, NY Total

268

0.24

413

-4.63

31.37

177

Longview, TX Total

197

0.23

430

95.05

155.84

178

Duluth, MN-WI Total

311

0.23

440

-30.43

-28.01

179

Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA Total

760

0.22

461

-35.65

-52.71

180

Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Total

345

0.21

467

-0.58

-27.06

181

Gulfport-Biloxi, MS Total

209

0.19

513

386.05*

1206.25*

182

Lexington-Fayette, KY Total

393

0.19

516

-40.45

-2.24

183

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX Total

470

0.19

526

-46.83

-57.89

184

Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Total

263

0.18

553

24.06

-7.72††

185

Lynchburg, VA Total

192

0.18

562

448.57*

255.56*

186

Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH Total

229

0.17

578

36.31

55.78

187

Spokane, WA Total

332

0.17

587

-41.45

-60.00

188

Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Total

591

0.16

642

-27.75

-66.53

189

Wilmington, NC Total

304

0.16

644

-49.33

-57.78

190

Lubbock, TX Total

183

0.16

644

-44.38

131.65

191

Lafayette, LA Total

168

0.15

659

54.13*

-9.19

192

Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC Total

218

0.14

722

-47.34

-63.61

193

Fayetteville, NC Total

195

0.13

774

-62.43

-73.61

194

Syracuse, NY Total

265

0.09

1,078

-31.88

-61.59

195

College Station-Bryan, TX Total

78

0.09

1,112

-7.14

5.41

196

Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA Total

73

0.09

1,119

204.17*

170.37*

197

Asheville, NC Total

174

0.09

1,147

-47.90

-66.28

198

Charleston, WV Total

112

0.08

1,298

107.41

4.67

199

Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA Total

65

0.08

1,317

-65.24

-87.33

200

Tuscaloosa, AL Total

72

0.08

1,318

12.50*

148.28*

201

Lincoln, NE Total

34

0.03

3,625

-83.73

-93.72

202

Utica-Rome, NY Total

25

0.02

5,441

-45.65

-74.23

203

Burlington-South Burlington, VT Total

11

0.01

8,066

-52.17

-42.11

*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or improvements
Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this MSA was discontinued starting in January 2009
†† Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this MSA was discontinued starting in September 2008

 

About RealtyTrac Inc.
RealtyTrac (http://www.realtytrac.com/) is the leading online marketplace of foreclosure properties, with more than 1.5 million default, auction and bank-owned listings from over 2,200 U.S. counties, along with detailed property, loan and home sales data. Hosting more than 3 million unique monthly visitors, RealtyTrac provides innovative technology solutions and practical education resources to facilitate buying, selling and investing in real estate. RealtyTrac’s foreclosure data has also been used by the Federal Reserve, FBI, U.S. Senate Joint Economic Committee and Banking Committee, U.S. Treasury Department, and numerous state housing and banking departments to help evaluate foreclosure trends and address policy issues related to foreclosures.

###
Media Contact:
Michelle Sabolich
Atomic Public Relations
415-402-0230
michelle.sabolich@atomicpr.com


Pages: