 |
SUN BELT DOMINATES FIRST HALF 2009 FORECLOSURE RANKINGS BUT UNEMPLOYMENT-RELATED FORECLOSURES MAY BE SPREADING
By RealtyTrac Staff
Las Vegas, Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Merced Post Top Metro Foreclosure Rates; Cities in Oregon, Utah, Idaho, Arkansas Show Significant Growth
IRVINE, Calif. – July 30, 2009 – RealtyTrac® (realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its Midyear 2009 Metropolitan Foreclosure Market Report, which shows that cities in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona continued to document the nation’s highest foreclosure rates in the first half of 2009, with those states accounting for 35 of the 50 highest foreclosure rates among metro areas with a population of 200,000 or more.
While some of the most foreclosure-saturated metro areas in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and California posted declining foreclosure activity in the first six months of 2009, other areas of the country not previously considered foreclosure hot spots have seen increased levels of activity. More than 20 percent of the metro areas which showed above average levels of foreclosure activity were in states such as Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Arkansas, Illinois and South Carolina, suggesting that much of the new foreclosure activity may be more directly related to growing unemployment than continuing fallout from subprime and adjustable rate loans.
“Foreclosure activity continued its upward trajectory nationwide and in the majority of metro areas in the first half of the year, but there are some significant differences beginning to show up in the data,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “While some of the markets that had the highest saturation of foreclosures over the past few years have seen declining rates, new markets like Provo, Utah, and Boise, Idaho, have seen large increases. As unemployment rates increase in different parts of the country, it’s very likely that we’ll see similar patterns develop elsewhere.”
Top metro foreclosure rates Las Vegas posted the nation’s highest metro foreclosure rate, with 7.45 percent of its housing units (one in 13) receiving at least one foreclosure filing in the first half of 2009 — more than six times the national average. A total of 58,691 Las Vegas properties received a foreclosure filing during the first half of 2009, a 22 percent increase from the previous six months and a 56 percent increase from the first half of 2009.
The Cape Coral-Fort Myers metro area in Florida documented the second highest metro foreclosure rate in the first half of 2009, with 7.20 percent of its housing units (one in every 14) receiving at least one foreclosure filing, and Merced, Calif., documented the third highest metro foreclosure rate, with 6.89 percent of its housing units (one in 15) receiving at least one foreclosure filing. Both Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Merced reported a slight decrease in foreclosure activity from the previous six months but still reported increasing foreclosure activity from the first half of 2008.
Other metro areas in the top 10 were the California cities of Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (5.73 percent), Stockton (5.64 percent), Modesto (5.38 percent), Bakersfield (4.53 percent) and Vallejo-Fairfield (4.48 percent), along with the Phoenix metro area (4.44 percent) and the Orlando, Fla., metro area (4.28 percent). All seven of these metro areas except for Stockton and Modesto reported increasing foreclosure activity from the previous six months and from the first six months of 2008.
Declining foreclosure activity in some foreclosure hot spots Foreclosure activity in Stockton decreased nearly 4 percent from the previous six months and nearly 13 percent from the first half of 2008, and foreclosure activity in Modesto decreased nearly 3 percent from the previous six months and more than 9 percent from the first half of 2008.
With 1.86 percent of its housing units receiving a foreclosure filing in the first half of 2009, Detroit’s foreclosure rate continued to rank among the top 50 metro foreclosure rates, but foreclosure activity there decreased 8 percent from the previous six months and 16 percent from the first half of 2008. Detroit’s foreclosure rate ranked highest in the nation in RealtyTrac’s 2006 and 2007 reports.
Foreclosure activity in Cleveland, which posted the nation’s sixth highest foreclosure rate in 2007, decreased 11 percent from the previous six months and 30 percent from the first half of 2008. With 1.36 percent of its housing units (one in 73) receiving at least one foreclosure filing, Cleveland’s foreclosure rate was still above the national average but was not among the top 50 metro foreclosure rates in the first half of 2009.
Other hard-hit Rust Belt cities posting year-over-year declines were Indianapolis and the Ohio cities of Toledo and Columbus.
Report methodology The RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the total number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported during the first six months of 2009. Data is also available at the individual county level and MSA level for Midyear 2009, Q2 2009 and June 2009. Data is collected from more than 2,200 counties nationwide, and those counties account for more than 90 percent of the U.S. population. RealtyTrac’s report incorporates documents filed in all three phases of foreclosure: Default — Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS); Auction — Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more than one foreclosure document is filed against a property during the month or quarter, only the most recent filing is counted in the report.
U.S. Metro Foreclosure Market Data – Jan-Jun 2009
| |
|
Properties with Foreclosure Filings |
| Rate Rank |
Metro Name |
Total
| %Housing Units |
1/every X HU |
%Change from Jul-Dec 08 |
%Change from Jan-Jun 08 |
|
-- |
U.S. Total |
1,528,364 |
1.19 |
84 |
9.46 |
14.66 |
|
1 |
Las Vegas-Paradise, NV Total |
58,691 |
7.45 |
13 |
22.20 |
56.22 |
|
2 |
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL Total |
25,926 |
7.20 |
14 |
-2.66 |
26.06 |
|
3 |
Merced, CA Total |
5,725 |
6.89 |
15 |
-2.00 |
14.73 |
|
4 |
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Total |
82,339 |
5.73 |
17 |
11.41 |
11.75 |
|
5 |
Stockton, CA Total |
12,787 |
5.64 |
18 |
-3.96 |
-12.79 |
|
6 |
Modesto, CA Total |
9,344 |
5.38 |
19 |
-2.75 |
-9.21 |
|
7 |
Bakersfield, CA Total |
12,176 |
4.53 |
22 |
10.62 |
17.34 |
|
8 |
Vallejo-Fairfield, CA Total |
6,706 |
4.48 |
22 |
3.92 |
6.63 |
|
9 |
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Total |
74,053 |
4.44 |
22 |
10.96 |
51.71 |
|
10 |
Orlando-Kissimmee, FL Total |
37,801 |
4.28 |
23 |
15.32 |
76.23 |
|
11 |
Port St. Lucie, FL Total |
8,249 |
4.00 |
25 |
1.76 |
27.50 |
|
12 |
Naples-Marco Island, FL Total |
6,990 |
3.64 |
27 |
12.22 |
56.90 |
|
13 |
Reno-Sparks, NV Total |
6,515 |
3.63 |
28 |
31.86 |
88.73 |
|
14 |
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL Total |
85,399 |
3.54 |
28 |
11.35 |
40.87 |
|
15 |
Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA Total |
29,324 |
3.46 |
29 |
8.58 |
1.51 |
|
16 |
Salinas, CA Total |
4,339 |
3.11 |
32 |
-8.52 |
-0.94 |
|
17 |
Fresno, CA Total |
9,375 |
3.08 |
32 |
14.74 |
17.13 |
|
18 |
Visalia-Porterville, CA Total |
3,948 |
2.91 |
34 |
25.97 |
50.63 |
|
19 |
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL Total |
6,635 |
2.69 |
37 |
15.92 |
46.82 |
|
20 |
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Total |
30,297 |
2.67 |
37 |
6.91 |
-0.05 |
|
21 |
Lakeland, FL Total |
7,407 |
2.67 |
37 |
3.36 |
47.52 |
|
22 |
Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL Total |
10,364 |
2.66 |
38 |
-4.20 |
18.11 |
|
23 |
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Total |
33,906 |
2.58 |
39 |
-2.98 |
31.50 |
|
24 |
Ocala, FL Total |
4,086 |
2.57 |
39 |
22.34 |
79.53 |
|
25 |
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Total |
6,762 |
2.48 |
40 |
15.45 |
18.67 |
|
26 |
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Total |
106,105 |
2.41 |
42 |
27.07 |
29.95 |
|
27 |
Prescott, AZ Total |
2,518 |
2.41 |
42 |
48.20 |
91.34 |
|
28 |
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL Total |
6,316 |
2.38 |
42 |
-2.52 |
20.05 |
|
29 |
Greeley, CO Total |
2,156 |
2.33 |
43 |
14.01 |
-11.53 |
|
30 |
Jacksonville, FL Total |
13,556 |
2.32 |
43 |
25.16 |
59.44 |
|
31 |
Provo-Orem, UT Total |
3,168 |
2.24 |
45 |
62.88 |
128.57 |
|
32 |
Boise City-Nampa, ID Total |
5,214 |
2.21 |
45 |
46.50 |
121.21* |
|
33 |
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Total |
4,164 |
2.11 |
47 |
4.83 |
21.51 |
|
34 |
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Total |
3,838 |
2.09 |
48 |
19.53 |
65.50 |
|
35 |
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Total |
42,799 |
2.02 |
49 |
10.93 |
11.47 |
|
36 |
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Total |
32,439 |
1.92 |
52 |
7.69 |
8.74 |
|
37 |
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Total |
11,924 |
1.89 |
53 |
10.51 |
17.56 |
|
38 |
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Total |
35,352 |
1.86 |
54 |
-8.23 |
-16.37 |
|
39 |
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI Total |
63,573 |
1.69 |
59 |
21.60 |
30.31 |
|
40 |
Tucson, AZ Total |
7,107 |
1.67 |
60 |
17.70 |
61.96 |
|
41 |
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA Total |
1,693 |
1.65 |
61 |
15.09 |
20.58 |
|
42 |
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA Total |
2,483 |
1.64 |
61 |
5.66 |
11.00 |
|
43 |
Memphis, TN-MS-AR Total |
8,598 |
1.57 |
64 |
0.29 |
-16.06†† |
|
44 |
Flint, MI Total |
3,028 |
1.53 |
65 |
-7.60 |
-17.04 |
|
45 |
Denver-Aurora, CO Total |
15,630 |
1.50 |
67 |
-7.90 |
-29.43 |
|
46 |
Indianapolis-Carmel, IN Total |
11,037 |
1.48 |
68 |
0.44 |
-11.98 |
|
47 |
San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA Total |
1,706 |
1.47 |
68 |
29.54 |
60.79 |
|
48 |
Columbus, OH Total |
11,231 |
1.45 |
69 |
1.44 |
-5.69 |
|
49 |
Colorado Springs, CO Total |
3,690 |
1.44 |
69 |
5.19 |
8.27 |
|
50 |
Lansing-East Lansing, MI Total |
2,822 |
1.44 |
70 |
23.45 |
17.63 |
|
51 |
Toledo, OH Total |
4,298 |
1.43 |
70 |
-1.94 |
-10.85 |
|
52 |
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL Total |
2,793 |
1.42 |
71 |
9.19 |
23.09 |
|
53 |
Rockford, IL Total |
2,029 |
1.41 |
71 |
24.94 |
15.09 |
|
54 |
Canton-Massillon, OH Total |
2,443 |
1.38 |
73 |
-2.71 |
-17.05 |
|
55 |
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Total |
29,211 |
1.37 |
73 |
-7.52† |
-9.56† |
|
56 |
Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH Total |
12,862 |
1.36 |
73 |
-11.45 |
-30.34 |
|
57 |
Chico, CA Total |
1,289 |
1.36 |
74 |
14.99 |
47.48 |
|
58 |
Salt Lake City, UT Total |
5,322 |
1.36 |
74 |
22.71 |
63.15 |
|
59 |
Ogden-Clearfield, UT Total |
2,397 |
1.35 |
74 |
49.91 |
82.00 |
|
60 |
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Total |
11,647 |
1.31 |
76 |
64.53 |
112.73 |
|
61 |
Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI Total |
4,178 |
1.31 |
76 |
2.05 |
13.72 |
|
62 |
Charleston-North Charleston, SC Total |
3,629 |
1.29 |
78 |
25.83 |
364.66* |
|
63 |
Dayton, OH Total |
4,717 |
1.24 |
81 |
1.27 |
-19.55 |
|
64 |
Salem, OR Total |
1,724 |
1.18 |
85 |
69.02 |
101.64 |
|
65 |
Macon, GA Total |
1,138 |
1.11 |
90 |
14.60 |
5.37 |
|
66 |
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Total |
14,629 |
1.11 |
90 |
39.43 |
58.63 |
|
67 |
Holland-Grand Haven, MI Total |
1,068 |
1.06 |
94 |
35.02 |
36.40 |
|
68 |
Gainesville, FL Total |
1,220 |
1.06 |
94 |
41.53 |
91.82 |
|
69 |
Akron, OH Total |
3,222 |
1.05 |
96 |
-30.12 |
-39.34 |
|
70 |
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI Total |
6,789 |
1.04 |
97 |
27.52 |
1.88 |
|
71 |
Green Bay, WI Total |
1,380 |
1.03 |
97 |
117.67 |
146.87* |
|
72 |
Ann Arbor, MI Total |
1,440 |
0.98 |
102 |
-4.89 |
-15.34 |
|
73 |
Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Total |
8,827 |
0.97 |
103 |
-5.73 |
-11.52 |
|
74 |
Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC Total |
2,594 |
0.97 |
104 |
22.82 |
138.64* |
|
75 |
Fort Wayne, IN Total |
1,681 |
0.95 |
106 |
-12.31 |
-14.19 |
|
76 |
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Total |
13,179 |
0.94 |
107 |
25.73 |
71.96 |
|
77 |
Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI Total |
823 |
0.93 |
108 |
-7.01 |
-26.52 |
|
78 |
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO Total |
1,179 |
0.93 |
108 |
2.61 |
-13.05 |
|
79 |
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA Total |
2,406 |
0.92 |
109 |
-0.62 |
-14.80 |
|
80 |
Kalamazoo-Portage, MI Total |
1,308 |
0.90 |
111 |
-3.04 |
3.56 |
|
81 |
Atlantic City, NJ Total |
1,131 |
0.89 |
112 |
-20.96 |
14.47 |
|
82 |
Worcester, MA Total |
2,828 |
0.89 |
112 |
-1.87 |
-38.06 |
|
83 |
Savannah, GA Total |
1,282 |
0.89 |
112 |
34.10 |
18.59 |
|
84 |
Tallahassee, FL Total |
1,391 |
0.88 |
114 |
24.09 |
61.93 |
|
85 |
Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC Total |
1,420 |
0.84 |
118 |
255.89* |
342.37* |
|
86 |
Kansas City, MO-KS Total |
7,087 |
0.82 |
122 |
-4.35† |
-8.27† |
|
87 |
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI Total |
1,126 |
0.81 |
124 |
-4.33 |
-10.49 |
|
88 |
Olympia, WA Total |
809 |
0.81 |
124 |
5.20 |
66.80 |
|
89 |
Manchester-Nashua, NH Total |
1,297 |
0.80 |
125 |
1.89 |
16.53 |
|
90 |
Eugene-Springfield, OR Total |
1,188 |
0.80 |
126 |
55.09 |
100.34 |
|
91 |
St. Louis, MO-IL Total |
9,713 |
0.79 |
127 |
-18.45† |
-21.16† |
|
92 |
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC Total |
5,284 |
0.78 |
129 |
10.18† |
127.56† |
|
93 |
Chattanooga, TN-GA Total |
1,759 |
0.77 |
130 |
11.75 |
-6.93†† |
|
94 |
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR Total |
2,264 |
0.77 |
130 |
-5.71 |
7.25 |
|
95 |
Birmingham-Hoover, AL Total |
3,814 |
0.76 |
131 |
217.04* |
271.37* |
|
96 |
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Total |
18,037 |
0.76 |
131 |
6.63 |
-16.52 |
|
97 |
New Haven-Milford, CT Total |
2,585 |
0.74 |
135 |
-16.02 |
-30.77 |
|
98 |
Mobile, AL Total |
1,313 |
0.73 |
136 |
75.30* |
28.22* |
|
99 |
York-Hanover, PA Total |
1,272 |
0.73 |
137 |
16.91 |
57.04 |
|
100 |
Tulsa, OK Total |
2,835 |
0.71 |
140 |
6.34 |
0.39 |
|
101 |
Brownsville-Harlingen, TX Total |
1,021 |
0.71 |
141 |
14.46 |
21.69 |
|
102 |
Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Total |
4,769 |
0.71 |
142 |
-2.33 |
-19.98 |
|
103 |
Richmond, VA Total |
3,549 |
0.70 |
144 |
21.21 |
33.02 |
|
104 |
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Total |
12,614 |
0.69 |
144 |
4.53 |
-40.69 |
|
105 |
San Antonio, TX Total |
5,185 |
0.68 |
146 |
24.58 |
20.00 |
|
106 |
Trenton-Ewing, NJ Total |
956 |
0.68 |
147 |
-37.60 |
-17.80 |
|
107 |
Reading, PA Total |
1,071 |
0.67 |
150 |
-11.05 |
81.22 |
|
108 |
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Total |
2,322 |
0.66 |
151 |
-19.57 |
-29.64 |
|
109 |
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Total |
14,213 |
0.65 |
153 |
3.52 |
-31.32 |
|
110 |
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN Total |
4,183 |
0.65 |
153 |
-4.93 |
-24.93†† |
|
111 |
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC Total |
1,459 |
0.64 |
155 |
21.08 |
3.84 |
|
112 |
Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC Total |
4,499 |
0.63 |
158 |
-11.70 |
-23.91 |
|
113 |
Springfield, MO Total |
1,129 |
0.62 |
163 |
-11.66† |
52.16† |
|
114 |
Montgomery, AL Total |
961 |
0.61 |
163 |
94.53* |
167.69* |
|
115 |
Boulder, CO Total |
754 |
0.61 |
164 |
8.96 |
-2.58 |
|
116 |
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL Total |
1,004 |
0.61 |
164 |
36.97 |
39.64 |
|
117 |
Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX Total |
882 |
0.61 |
165 |
28.01 |
40.00 |
|
118 |
Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA Total |
1,414 |
0.60 |
167 |
11.34 |
48.53 |
|
119 |
New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Total |
2,646 |
0.60 |
167 |
10.94 |
18.23 |
|
120 |
Columbia, SC Total |
1,860 |
0.60 |
167 |
22.29 |
31.63 |
|
121 |
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Total |
14,219 |
0.60 |
168 |
-7.89 |
-5.95 |
|
122 |
Madison, WI Total |
1,464 |
0.59 |
169 |
138.44* |
69.05* |
|
123 |
Greensboro-High Point, NC Total |
1,834 |
0.59 |
170 |
-22.97 |
-13.98 |
|
124 |
Springfield, MA Total |
1,653 |
0.58 |
171 |
17.40 |
-50.52 |
|
125 |
Austin-Round Rock, TX Total |
3,689 |
0.58 |
173 |
19.19 |
26.68 |
|
126 |
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Total |
1,888 |
0.57 |
176 |
34.47* |
68.57* |
|
127 |
Bremerton-Silverdale, WA Total |
567 |
0.56 |
178 |
-11.82 |
5.00 |
|
128 |
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Total |
1,354 |
0.55 |
182 |
-19.12 |
-3.01 |
|
129 |
Winston-Salem, NC Total |
1,123 |
0.54 |
184 |
-21.85 |
-19.90 |
|
130 |
Columbus, GA-AL Total |
686 |
0.54 |
187 |
17.47 |
3.47 |
|
131 |
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN Total |
2,922 |
0.53 |
187 |
3.43 |
50.93 |
|
132 |
Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV Total |
598 |
0.53 |
189 |
18.89 |
33.18 |
|
133 |
Roanoke, VA Total |
738 |
0.53 |
189 |
294.65* |
515.00* |
|
134 |
Pittsburgh, PA Total |
5,830 |
0.53 |
190 |
-8.68 |
14.49 |
|
135 |
Anchorage, AK Total |
728 |
0.52 |
192 |
-17.08 |
3.70 |
|
136 |
Knoxville, TN Total |
1,604 |
0.52 |
193 |
-6.09 |
-21.26†† |
|
137 |
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Total |
2,518 |
0.51 |
195 |
-13.68 |
-33.53 |
|
138 |
Albuquerque, NM Total |
1,781 |
0.50 |
198 |
37.74* |
-0.28 |
|
139 |
Fort Smith, AR-OK Total |
614 |
0.50 |
201 |
18.99 |
6.41 |
|
140 |
Norwich-New London, CT Total |
574 |
0.49 |
203 |
-24.17 |
-30.51 |
|
141 |
Huntsville, AL Total |
819 |
0.49 |
204 |
85.71* |
136.02* |
|
142 |
Appleton, WI Total |
442 |
0.49 |
205 |
114.56* |
29.62* |
|
143 |
Honolulu, HI Total |
1,616 |
0.48 |
207 |
30.53 |
275.81 |
|
144 |
Amarillo, TX Total |
467 |
0.48 |
210 |
9.37 |
5.66 |
|
145 |
Raleigh-Cary, NC Total |
2,024 |
0.48 |
210 |
-4.44 |
-24.70 |
|
146 |
Wichita, KS Total |
1,226 |
0.47 |
211 |
18.23 |
39.48 |
|
147 |
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA Total |
34,889 |
0.47 |
211 |
-7.34 |
-23.46 |
|
148 |
Baltimore-Towson, MD Total |
5,224 |
0.47 |
212 |
-11.08 |
-22.48 |
|
149 |
Barnstable Town, MA Total |
727 |
0.47 |
214 |
18.02 |
-55.99 |
|
150 |
Clarksville, TN-KY Total |
498 |
0.46 |
218 |
-1.97 |
-10.75†† |
|
151 |
Waco, TX Total |
404 |
0.44 |
227 |
3.32 |
-9.62 |
|
152 |
Lancaster, PA Total |
796 |
0.41 |
244 |
1.14 |
90.89* |
|
153 |
Peoria, IL Total |
667 |
0.41 |
244 |
-11.77 |
-22.44 |
|
154 |
El Paso, TX Total |
1,036 |
0.41 |
244 |
37.77 |
42.11 |
|
155 |
Laredo, TX Total |
281 |
0.41 |
246 |
2.93 |
103.62 |
|
156 |
Jackson, MS Total |
865 |
0.39 |
254 |
157.44* |
85.22* |
|
157 |
Springfield, IL Total |
373 |
0.39 |
258 |
-16.37 |
-29.49 |
|
158 |
Baton Rouge, LA Total |
1,237 |
0.39 |
259 |
189.70* |
67.39* |
|
159 |
Topeka, KS Total |
392 |
0.38 |
263 |
20.62 |
29.80 |
|
160 |
Rochester, NY Total |
1,601 |
0.36 |
276 |
-12.23 |
-28.04 |
|
161 |
Corpus Christi, TX Total |
636 |
0.36 |
277 |
-0.93 |
-7.69 |
|
162 |
Durham, NC Total |
740 |
0.35 |
288 |
-20.43 |
-44.86 |
|
163 |
Erie, PA Total |
407 |
0.35 |
290 |
29.62 |
41.32* |
|
164 |
Oklahoma City, OK Total |
1,707 |
0.33 |
305 |
-34.65 |
-47.22 |
|
165 |
Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY Total |
1,663 |
0.32 |
313 |
-30.21 |
2.28* |
|
166 |
Yakima, WA Total |
261 |
0.32 |
317 |
50.87 |
-21.86 |
|
167 |
Cedar Rapids, IA Total |
347 |
0.31 |
320 |
-2.80 |
-10.80 |
|
168 |
Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Total |
501 |
0.29 |
344 |
68.69 |
53.21 |
|
169 |
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Total |
699 |
0.27 |
369 |
-10.50 |
-30.65 |
|
170 |
Champaign-Urbana, IL Total |
255 |
0.26 |
382 |
32.81 |
-10.84 |
|
171 |
Sioux Falls, SD Total |
235 |
0.26 |
389 |
19.90 |
66.67 |
|
172 |
Evansville, IN-KY Total |
409 |
0.26 |
390 |
-37.94 |
-42.64 |
|
173 |
Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME Total |
644 |
0.25 |
395 |
-11.29 |
-9.93 |
|
174 |
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Total |
573 |
0.25 |
402 |
93.58* |
-10.47 |
|
175 |
Spartanburg, SC Total |
298 |
0.25 |
405 |
-46.98 |
-44.09 |
|
176 |
Binghamton, NY Total |
268 |
0.24 |
413 |
-4.63 |
31.37 |
|
177 |
Longview, TX Total |
197 |
0.23 |
430 |
95.05 |
155.84 |
|
178 |
Duluth, MN-WI Total |
311 |
0.23 |
440 |
-30.43 |
-28.01 |
|
179 |
Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA Total |
760 |
0.22 |
461 |
-35.65 |
-52.71 |
|
180 |
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Total |
345 |
0.21 |
467 |
-0.58 |
-27.06 |
|
181 |
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS Total |
209 |
0.19 |
513 |
386.05* |
1206.25* |
|
182 |
Lexington-Fayette, KY Total |
393 |
0.19 |
516 |
-40.45 |
-2.24 |
|
183 |
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX Total |
470 |
0.19 |
526 |
-46.83 |
-57.89 |
|
184 |
Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Total |
263 |
0.18 |
553 |
24.06 |
-7.72†† |
|
185 |
Lynchburg, VA Total |
192 |
0.18 |
562 |
448.57* |
255.56* |
|
186 |
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH Total |
229 |
0.17 |
578 |
36.31 |
55.78 |
|
187 |
Spokane, WA Total |
332 |
0.17 |
587 |
-41.45 |
-60.00 |
|
188 |
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Total |
591 |
0.16 |
642 |
-27.75 |
-66.53 |
|
189 |
Wilmington, NC Total |
304 |
0.16 |
644 |
-49.33 |
-57.78 |
|
190 |
Lubbock, TX Total |
183 |
0.16 |
644 |
-44.38 |
131.65 |
|
191 |
Lafayette, LA Total |
168 |
0.15 |
659 |
54.13* |
-9.19 |
|
192 |
Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC Total |
218 |
0.14 |
722 |
-47.34 |
-63.61 |
|
193 |
Fayetteville, NC Total |
195 |
0.13 |
774 |
-62.43 |
-73.61 |
|
194 |
Syracuse, NY Total |
265 |
0.09 |
1,078 |
-31.88 |
-61.59 |
|
195 |
College Station-Bryan, TX Total |
78 |
0.09 |
1,112 |
-7.14 |
5.41 |
|
196 |
Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA Total |
73 |
0.09 |
1,119 |
204.17* |
170.37* |
|
197 |
Asheville, NC Total |
174 |
0.09 |
1,147 |
-47.90 |
-66.28 |
|
198 |
Charleston, WV Total |
112 |
0.08 |
1,298 |
107.41 |
4.67 |
|
199 |
Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA Total |
65 |
0.08 |
1,317 |
-65.24 |
-87.33 |
|
200 |
Tuscaloosa, AL Total |
72 |
0.08 |
1,318 |
12.50* |
148.28* |
|
201 |
Lincoln, NE Total |
34 |
0.03 |
3,625 |
-83.73 |
-93.72 |
|
202 |
Utica-Rome, NY Total |
25 |
0.02 |
5,441 |
-45.65 |
-74.23 |
|
203 |
Burlington-South Burlington, VT Total |
11 |
0.01 |
8,066 |
-52.17 |
-42.11 |
*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or improvements † Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this MSA was discontinued starting in January 2009 †† Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this MSA was discontinued starting in September 2008
About RealtyTrac Inc. RealtyTrac (http://www.realtytrac.com/) is the leading online marketplace of foreclosure properties, with more than 1.5 million default, auction and bank-owned listings from over 2,200 U.S. counties, along with detailed property, loan and home sales data. Hosting more than 3 million unique monthly visitors, RealtyTrac provides innovative technology solutions and practical education resources to facilitate buying, selling and investing in real estate. RealtyTrac’s foreclosure data has also been used by the Federal Reserve, FBI, U.S. Senate Joint Economic Committee and Banking Committee, U.S. Treasury Department, and numerous state housing and banking departments to help evaluate foreclosure trends and address policy issues related to foreclosures.
### Media Contact: Michelle Sabolich Atomic Public Relations 415-402-0230 michelle.sabolich@atomicpr.com |